Effect of the goals of care intervention for advanced dementia: A randomized clinical trial

Laura C. Hanson, Sheryl Zimmerman, Mi Kyung Song, Feng Chang Lin, Cherie Rosemond, Timothy S. Carey, Susan L. Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 9 Citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE In advanced dementia, goals of care decisions are challenging and medical care is often more intensive than desired. OBJECTIVE To test a goals of care (GOC) decision aid intervention to improve quality of communication and palliative care for nursing home residents with advanced dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-blind cluster randomized clinical trial, including 302 residents with advanced dementia and their family decision makers in 22 nursing homes. INTERVENTIONS A GOC video decision aid plus a structured discussion with nursing home health care providers; attention control with an informational video and usual care planning. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes at 3 monthswere quality of communication (QOC, questionnaire scored 0-10 with higher ratings indicating better quality), family report of concordance with clinicians on the primary goal of care (endorsing same goal as the "best goal to guide care and medical treatment, " and clinicians' "top priority for care and medical treatment"), and treatment consistent with preferences (Advance Care Planning Problem score). Secondary outcomes at 9 months were family ratings of symptom management and care, palliative care domains in care plans, Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) completion, and hospital transfers. Resident-family dyads were the primary unit of analysis, and all analyses used intention-to-treat assignment. RESULTS Residents' mean age was 86.5 years, 39 (12.9%) were African American, and 246 (81.5%) were women. With the GOC intervention, family decision makers reported better quality of communication (QOC, 6.0 vs 5.6; P = .05) and better end-of-life communication (QOC end-of-life subscale, 3.7 vs 3.0; P = .02). Goal concordance did not differ at 3 months, but family decision makers with the intervention reported greater concordance by 9 months or death (133 [88.4%] vs 108 [71.2%], P = .001). Family ratings of treatment consistent with preferences, symptom management, and quality of care did not differ. Residents in the intervention group had more palliative care content in treatment plans (5.6 vs 4.7, P = .02), MOST order sets (35%vs 16%, P = .05), and half as many hospital transfers (0.078 vs 0.163 per 90 person-days; RR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.26-0.88). Survival at 9 months was unaffected (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95%CI, 0.54-1.08; P = .13). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The GOC decision aid intervention is effective to improve end-of-life communication for nursing home residents with advanced dementia and enhance palliative care plans while reducing hospital transfers. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01565642.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages24-31
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Internal Medicine
Volume177
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Patient Care Planning
Dementia
Randomized Controlled Trials
Nursing Homes
Communication
Decision Support Techniques
Palliative Care
Quality of Health Care
Therapeutics
Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing
Advance Care Planning
Intention to Treat Analysis
African Americans
Health Personnel
Primary Health Care
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Effect of the goals of care intervention for advanced dementia : A randomized clinical trial. / Hanson, Laura C.; Zimmerman, Sheryl; Song, Mi Kyung; Lin, Feng Chang; Rosemond, Cherie; Carey, Timothy S.; Mitchell, Susan L.

In: JAMA Internal Medicine, Vol. 177, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 24-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d24a17af6414eaebeb3877ac8973970,
title = "Effect of the goals of care intervention for advanced dementia: A randomized clinical trial",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE In advanced dementia, goals of care decisions are challenging and medical care is often more intensive than desired. OBJECTIVE To test a goals of care (GOC) decision aid intervention to improve quality of communication and palliative care for nursing home residents with advanced dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-blind cluster randomized clinical trial, including 302 residents with advanced dementia and their family decision makers in 22 nursing homes. INTERVENTIONS A GOC video decision aid plus a structured discussion with nursing home health care providers; attention control with an informational video and usual care planning. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes at 3 monthswere quality of communication (QOC, questionnaire scored 0-10 with higher ratings indicating better quality), family report of concordance with clinicians on the primary goal of care (endorsing same goal as the {"}best goal to guide care and medical treatment, {"} and clinicians\{textquoteleft} {"}top priority for care and medical treatment{"}), and treatment consistent with preferences (Advance Care Planning Problem score). Secondary outcomes at 9 months were family ratings of symptom management and care, palliative care domains in care plans, Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) completion, and hospital transfers. Resident-family dyads were the primary unit of analysis, and all analyses used intention-to-treat assignment. RESULTS Residents\{textquoteleft} mean age was 86.5 years, 39 (12.9\{%}) were African American, and 246 (81.5\{%}) were women. With the GOC intervention, family decision makers reported better quality of communication (QOC, 6.0 vs 5.6; P = .05) and better end-of-life communication (QOC end-of-life subscale, 3.7 vs 3.0; P = .02). Goal concordance did not differ at 3 months, but family decision makers with the intervention reported greater concordance by 9 months or death (133 [88.4\{%}] vs 108 [71.2\{%}], P = .001). Family ratings of treatment consistent with preferences, symptom management, and quality of care did not differ. Residents in the intervention group had more palliative care content in treatment plans (5.6 vs 4.7, P = .02), MOST order sets (35\{%}vs 16\{%}, P = .05), and half as many hospital transfers (0.078 vs 0.163 per 90 person-days; RR, 0.47; 95\{%}CI, 0.26-0.88). Survival at 9 months was unaffected (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95\{%}CI, 0.54-1.08; P = .13). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The GOC decision aid intervention is effective to improve end-of-life communication for nursing home residents with advanced dementia and enhance palliative care plans while reducing hospital transfers. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01565642.",
author = "Hanson, {Laura C.} and Sheryl Zimmerman and Song, {Mi Kyung} and Lin, {Feng Chang} and Cherie Rosemond and Carey, {Timothy S.} and Mitchell, {Susan L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "177",
pages = "24--31",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of the goals of care intervention for advanced dementia

T2 - JAMA Internal Medicine

AU - Hanson,Laura C.

AU - Zimmerman,Sheryl

AU - Song,Mi Kyung

AU - Lin,Feng Chang

AU - Rosemond,Cherie

AU - Carey,Timothy S.

AU - Mitchell,Susan L.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE In advanced dementia, goals of care decisions are challenging and medical care is often more intensive than desired. OBJECTIVE To test a goals of care (GOC) decision aid intervention to improve quality of communication and palliative care for nursing home residents with advanced dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-blind cluster randomized clinical trial, including 302 residents with advanced dementia and their family decision makers in 22 nursing homes. INTERVENTIONS A GOC video decision aid plus a structured discussion with nursing home health care providers; attention control with an informational video and usual care planning. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes at 3 monthswere quality of communication (QOC, questionnaire scored 0-10 with higher ratings indicating better quality), family report of concordance with clinicians on the primary goal of care (endorsing same goal as the "best goal to guide care and medical treatment, " and clinicians' "top priority for care and medical treatment"), and treatment consistent with preferences (Advance Care Planning Problem score). Secondary outcomes at 9 months were family ratings of symptom management and care, palliative care domains in care plans, Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) completion, and hospital transfers. Resident-family dyads were the primary unit of analysis, and all analyses used intention-to-treat assignment. RESULTS Residents' mean age was 86.5 years, 39 (12.9%) were African American, and 246 (81.5%) were women. With the GOC intervention, family decision makers reported better quality of communication (QOC, 6.0 vs 5.6; P = .05) and better end-of-life communication (QOC end-of-life subscale, 3.7 vs 3.0; P = .02). Goal concordance did not differ at 3 months, but family decision makers with the intervention reported greater concordance by 9 months or death (133 [88.4%] vs 108 [71.2%], P = .001). Family ratings of treatment consistent with preferences, symptom management, and quality of care did not differ. Residents in the intervention group had more palliative care content in treatment plans (5.6 vs 4.7, P = .02), MOST order sets (35%vs 16%, P = .05), and half as many hospital transfers (0.078 vs 0.163 per 90 person-days; RR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.26-0.88). Survival at 9 months was unaffected (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95%CI, 0.54-1.08; P = .13). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The GOC decision aid intervention is effective to improve end-of-life communication for nursing home residents with advanced dementia and enhance palliative care plans while reducing hospital transfers. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01565642.

AB - IMPORTANCE In advanced dementia, goals of care decisions are challenging and medical care is often more intensive than desired. OBJECTIVE To test a goals of care (GOC) decision aid intervention to improve quality of communication and palliative care for nursing home residents with advanced dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-blind cluster randomized clinical trial, including 302 residents with advanced dementia and their family decision makers in 22 nursing homes. INTERVENTIONS A GOC video decision aid plus a structured discussion with nursing home health care providers; attention control with an informational video and usual care planning. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes at 3 monthswere quality of communication (QOC, questionnaire scored 0-10 with higher ratings indicating better quality), family report of concordance with clinicians on the primary goal of care (endorsing same goal as the "best goal to guide care and medical treatment, " and clinicians' "top priority for care and medical treatment"), and treatment consistent with preferences (Advance Care Planning Problem score). Secondary outcomes at 9 months were family ratings of symptom management and care, palliative care domains in care plans, Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) completion, and hospital transfers. Resident-family dyads were the primary unit of analysis, and all analyses used intention-to-treat assignment. RESULTS Residents' mean age was 86.5 years, 39 (12.9%) were African American, and 246 (81.5%) were women. With the GOC intervention, family decision makers reported better quality of communication (QOC, 6.0 vs 5.6; P = .05) and better end-of-life communication (QOC end-of-life subscale, 3.7 vs 3.0; P = .02). Goal concordance did not differ at 3 months, but family decision makers with the intervention reported greater concordance by 9 months or death (133 [88.4%] vs 108 [71.2%], P = .001). Family ratings of treatment consistent with preferences, symptom management, and quality of care did not differ. Residents in the intervention group had more palliative care content in treatment plans (5.6 vs 4.7, P = .02), MOST order sets (35%vs 16%, P = .05), and half as many hospital transfers (0.078 vs 0.163 per 90 person-days; RR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.26-0.88). Survival at 9 months was unaffected (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95%CI, 0.54-1.08; P = .13). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The GOC decision aid intervention is effective to improve end-of-life communication for nursing home residents with advanced dementia and enhance palliative care plans while reducing hospital transfers. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01565642.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011283221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011283221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031

DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031

M3 - Article

VL - 177

SP - 24

EP - 31

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 1

ER -