Communication flows and the durability of a transnational social field

Ashton M. Verdery, Ted Mouw, Heather Edelblute, Sergio Chavez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We draw on unique data on communication flows between migrants and non-migrants in a bi-national, cross-border social network to test competing theories of the process of social incorporation. While advocates of the assimilation perspective argue that social incorporation is largely a one-way street, a recent literature on immigrant transnationalism challenges this view by arguing that changes in communication technologies and reductions in travel costs have made it possible for migrants to retain meaningful connections to their origin communities. In the context of this debate, we argue that communication flows—as measured by a combination of the number of social ties and the frequency of communication with them—provide an empirical test of the potential durability of cross-border networks. In our analysis, we find mixed support for both transnationalism and assimilation: while the classic assimilation perspective is correct that the strength of migrants’ ties to origin attenuates as time in the destination increases, we also find evidence of a striking persistence in cross-border communication that is reinvigorated by migrant return visits, consistent with an attenuated view of transnationalism.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages57-71
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Networks
Volume53
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

social field
information flow
migrant
Communication
assimilation
test theory
communication
persistence
communication technology
social network
Social Support
travel
immigrant
Technology
Costs and Cost Analysis
costs
community
evidence

Keywords

  • Communication flows
  • Migrant networks
  • Transnationalism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Anthropology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Communication flows and the durability of a transnational social field. / Verdery, Ashton M.; Mouw, Ted; Edelblute, Heather; Chavez, Sergio.

In: Social Networks, Vol. 53, 01.05.2018, p. 57-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Verdery AM, Mouw T, Edelblute H, Chavez S. Communication flows and the durability of a transnational social field. Social Networks. 2018 May 1;53:57-71. Available from, DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.03.002
Verdery, Ashton M. ; Mouw, Ted ; Edelblute, Heather ; Chavez, Sergio. / Communication flows and the durability of a transnational social field. In: Social Networks. 2018 ; Vol. 53. pp. 57-71
@article{78e47ab00d7245e9ba109cd2f4894c51,
title = "Communication flows and the durability of a transnational social field",
abstract = "We draw on unique data on communication flows between migrants and non-migrants in a bi-national, cross-border social network to test competing theories of the process of social incorporation. While advocates of the assimilation perspective argue that social incorporation is largely a one-way street, a recent literature on immigrant transnationalism challenges this view by arguing that changes in communication technologies and reductions in travel costs have made it possible for migrants to retain meaningful connections to their origin communities. In the context of this debate, we argue that communication flows—as measured by a combination of the number of social ties and the frequency of communication with them—provide an empirical test of the potential durability of cross-border networks. In our analysis, we find mixed support for both transnationalism and assimilation: while the classic assimilation perspective is correct that the strength of migrants’ ties to origin attenuates as time in the destination increases, we also find evidence of a striking persistence in cross-border communication that is reinvigorated by migrant return visits, consistent with an attenuated view of transnationalism.",
keywords = "Communication flows, Migrant networks, Transnationalism",
author = "Verdery, {Ashton M.} and Ted Mouw and Heather Edelblute and Sergio Chavez",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socnet.2017.03.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "57--71",
journal = "Social Networks",
issn = "0378-8733",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication flows and the durability of a transnational social field

AU - Verdery,Ashton M.

AU - Mouw,Ted

AU - Edelblute,Heather

AU - Chavez,Sergio

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - We draw on unique data on communication flows between migrants and non-migrants in a bi-national, cross-border social network to test competing theories of the process of social incorporation. While advocates of the assimilation perspective argue that social incorporation is largely a one-way street, a recent literature on immigrant transnationalism challenges this view by arguing that changes in communication technologies and reductions in travel costs have made it possible for migrants to retain meaningful connections to their origin communities. In the context of this debate, we argue that communication flows—as measured by a combination of the number of social ties and the frequency of communication with them—provide an empirical test of the potential durability of cross-border networks. In our analysis, we find mixed support for both transnationalism and assimilation: while the classic assimilation perspective is correct that the strength of migrants’ ties to origin attenuates as time in the destination increases, we also find evidence of a striking persistence in cross-border communication that is reinvigorated by migrant return visits, consistent with an attenuated view of transnationalism.

AB - We draw on unique data on communication flows between migrants and non-migrants in a bi-national, cross-border social network to test competing theories of the process of social incorporation. While advocates of the assimilation perspective argue that social incorporation is largely a one-way street, a recent literature on immigrant transnationalism challenges this view by arguing that changes in communication technologies and reductions in travel costs have made it possible for migrants to retain meaningful connections to their origin communities. In the context of this debate, we argue that communication flows—as measured by a combination of the number of social ties and the frequency of communication with them—provide an empirical test of the potential durability of cross-border networks. In our analysis, we find mixed support for both transnationalism and assimilation: while the classic assimilation perspective is correct that the strength of migrants’ ties to origin attenuates as time in the destination increases, we also find evidence of a striking persistence in cross-border communication that is reinvigorated by migrant return visits, consistent with an attenuated view of transnationalism.

KW - Communication flows

KW - Migrant networks

KW - Transnationalism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014672363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014672363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.03.002

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 57

EP - 71

JO - Social Networks

T2 - Social Networks

JF - Social Networks

SN - 0378-8733

ER -