Aligning for accountable care: Strategic practices for change in accountable care organizations

Brian Hilligoss, Paula H. Song, Ann Scheck McAlearney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Background: Alignment within accountable care organizations (ACOs) is crucial if these new entities are to achieve their lofty goals. However, the concept of alignment remains underexamined, and we know little about the work entailed in creating alignment. Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop the concept of aligning by identifying and describing the strategic practices administrators use to align the structures, processes, and behaviors of their organizations and individual providers in pursuit of accountable care. Approach: We conducted 2-year qualitative case studies of four ACOs that have assumed full risk for the costs and quality of care for defined populations. Findings: Five strategic aligning practices were used byall four ACOs. Informing both aligns providers' understandings with the goals and value proposition of the ACO and aligns the providers' attention with the drivers of performance. Involving both aligns ACO leaders' understandings with the realities facing providers and aligns the policiesofthe ACO with the needs of providers. Enhancing both aligns the operations of individual provider practices with the operations of the ACO and aligns the trustofproviders with the ACO. Motivating aligns what providers value with the goalsofthe ACO. Finally, evolvingis a metapractice of learning and adapting that guides the execution of the other four practices. Practice Implications: Our findings suggest that there are second-order cognitive (e.g., understandings and attention) and cultural (e.g., trust and values) levels of alignment, as well as a first-order operational level (organizational structures, processes, and incentives). A well-aligned organization may require ongoing repositioning at each of these levels, as well as attention to both cooperative and coordinative dimensions of alignment. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages192-202
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Care Management Review
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Accountable Care Organizations
Organizations
Quality of Health Care
Administrative Personnel
Motivation
Learning

Keywords

  • Accountable care organization
  • Alignment
  • Integration
  • Organizational change
  • Qualitative case studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Aligning for accountable care : Strategic practices for change in accountable care organizations. / Hilligoss, Brian; Song, Paula H.; McAlearney, Ann Scheck.

In: Health Care Management Review, Vol. 42, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 192-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b54a39a69fe465eafb4e48731131cec,
title = "Aligning for accountable care: Strategic practices for change in accountable care organizations",
abstract = "Background: Alignment within accountable care organizations (ACOs) is crucial if these new entities are to achieve their lofty goals. However, the concept of alignment remains underexamined, and we know little about the work entailed in creating alignment. Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop the concept of aligning by identifying and describing the strategic practices administrators use to align the structures, processes, and behaviors of their organizations and individual providers in pursuit of accountable care. Approach: We conducted 2-year qualitative case studies of four ACOs that have assumed full risk for the costs and quality of care for defined populations. Findings: Five strategic aligning practices were used byall four ACOs. Informing both aligns providers' understandings with the goals and value proposition of the ACO and aligns the providers' attention with the drivers of performance. Involving both aligns ACO leaders' understandings with the realities facing providers and aligns the policiesofthe ACO with the needs of providers. Enhancing both aligns the operations of individual provider practices with the operations of the ACO and aligns the trustofproviders with the ACO. Motivating aligns what providers value with the goalsofthe ACO. Finally, evolvingis a metapractice of learning and adapting that guides the execution of the other four practices. Practice Implications: Our findings suggest that there are second-order cognitive (e.g., understandings and attention) and cultural (e.g., trust and values) levels of alignment, as well as a first-order operational level (organizational structures, processes, and incentives). A well-aligned organization may require ongoing repositioning at each of these levels, as well as attention to both cooperative and coordinative dimensions of alignment. Implications for research and practice are discussed.",
keywords = "Accountable care organization, Alignment, Integration, Organizational change, Qualitative case studies",
author = "Brian Hilligoss and Song, {Paula H.} and McAlearney, {Ann Scheck}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/HMR.0000000000000110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "192--202",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning for accountable care

T2 - Health Care Management Review

AU - Hilligoss, Brian

AU - Song, Paula H.

AU - McAlearney, Ann Scheck

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Alignment within accountable care organizations (ACOs) is crucial if these new entities are to achieve their lofty goals. However, the concept of alignment remains underexamined, and we know little about the work entailed in creating alignment. Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop the concept of aligning by identifying and describing the strategic practices administrators use to align the structures, processes, and behaviors of their organizations and individual providers in pursuit of accountable care. Approach: We conducted 2-year qualitative case studies of four ACOs that have assumed full risk for the costs and quality of care for defined populations. Findings: Five strategic aligning practices were used byall four ACOs. Informing both aligns providers' understandings with the goals and value proposition of the ACO and aligns the providers' attention with the drivers of performance. Involving both aligns ACO leaders' understandings with the realities facing providers and aligns the policiesofthe ACO with the needs of providers. Enhancing both aligns the operations of individual provider practices with the operations of the ACO and aligns the trustofproviders with the ACO. Motivating aligns what providers value with the goalsofthe ACO. Finally, evolvingis a metapractice of learning and adapting that guides the execution of the other four practices. Practice Implications: Our findings suggest that there are second-order cognitive (e.g., understandings and attention) and cultural (e.g., trust and values) levels of alignment, as well as a first-order operational level (organizational structures, processes, and incentives). A well-aligned organization may require ongoing repositioning at each of these levels, as well as attention to both cooperative and coordinative dimensions of alignment. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

AB - Background: Alignment within accountable care organizations (ACOs) is crucial if these new entities are to achieve their lofty goals. However, the concept of alignment remains underexamined, and we know little about the work entailed in creating alignment. Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop the concept of aligning by identifying and describing the strategic practices administrators use to align the structures, processes, and behaviors of their organizations and individual providers in pursuit of accountable care. Approach: We conducted 2-year qualitative case studies of four ACOs that have assumed full risk for the costs and quality of care for defined populations. Findings: Five strategic aligning practices were used byall four ACOs. Informing both aligns providers' understandings with the goals and value proposition of the ACO and aligns the providers' attention with the drivers of performance. Involving both aligns ACO leaders' understandings with the realities facing providers and aligns the policiesofthe ACO with the needs of providers. Enhancing both aligns the operations of individual provider practices with the operations of the ACO and aligns the trustofproviders with the ACO. Motivating aligns what providers value with the goalsofthe ACO. Finally, evolvingis a metapractice of learning and adapting that guides the execution of the other four practices. Practice Implications: Our findings suggest that there are second-order cognitive (e.g., understandings and attention) and cultural (e.g., trust and values) levels of alignment, as well as a first-order operational level (organizational structures, processes, and incentives). A well-aligned organization may require ongoing repositioning at each of these levels, as well as attention to both cooperative and coordinative dimensions of alignment. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

KW - Accountable care organization

KW - Alignment

KW - Integration

KW - Organizational change

KW - Qualitative case studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973547921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973547921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000110

DO - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000110

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 192

EP - 202

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

IS - 3

ER -