A Methodology for Using Workforce Data to Decide Which Specialties and States to Target for Graduate Medical Education Expansion

Erin P. Fraher, Andy Knapton, George M. Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Objective: To outline a methodology for allocating graduate medical education (GME) training positions based on data from a workforce projection model. Data Sources: Demand for visits is derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and Census data. Physician supply, retirements, and geographic mobility are estimated using concatenated AMA Masterfiles and ABMS certification data. The number and specialization behaviors of residents are derived from the AAMC's GMETrack survey. Design: We show how the methodology could be used to allocate 3,000 new GME slots over 5 years—15,000 total positions—by state and specialty to address workforce shortages in 2026. Extraction Methods: We use the model to identify shortages for 19 types of health care services provided by 35 specialties in 50 states. Principal Findings: The new GME slots are allocated to nearly all specialties, but nine states and the District of Columbia do not receive any new positions. Conclusions: This analysis illustrates an objective, evidence-based methodology for allocating GME positions that could be used as the starting point for discussions about GME expansion or redistribution.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages508-528
Number of pages21
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume52
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Graduate Medical Education
Retirement
Information Storage and Retrieval
Certification
Censuses
Health Expenditures
Health Services
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians

Keywords

  • Health policy/politics/law/regulation
  • health workforce distribution/incomes/training
  • medicare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

A Methodology for Using Workforce Data to Decide Which Specialties and States to Target for Graduate Medical Education Expansion. / Fraher, Erin P.; Knapton, Andy; Holmes, George M.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 52, 01.02.2017, p. 508-528.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17fd49f95b174408a439d9af2015fe38,
title = "A Methodology for Using Workforce Data to Decide Which Specialties and States to Target for Graduate Medical Education Expansion",
abstract = "Objective: To outline a methodology for allocating graduate medical education (GME) training positions based on data from a workforce projection model. Data Sources: Demand for visits is derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and Census data. Physician supply, retirements, and geographic mobility are estimated using concatenated AMA Masterfiles and ABMS certification data. The number and specialization behaviors of residents are derived from the AAMC's GMETrack survey. Design: We show how the methodology could be used to allocate 3,000 new GME slots over 5 years—15,000 total positions—by state and specialty to address workforce shortages in 2026. Extraction Methods: We use the model to identify shortages for 19 types of health care services provided by 35 specialties in 50 states. Principal Findings: The new GME slots are allocated to nearly all specialties, but nine states and the District of Columbia do not receive any new positions. Conclusions: This analysis illustrates an objective, evidence-based methodology for allocating GME positions that could be used as the starting point for discussions about GME expansion or redistribution.",
keywords = "Health policy/politics/law/regulation, health workforce distribution/incomes/training, medicare",
author = "Fraher, {Erin P.} and Andy Knapton and Holmes, {George M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.12649",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "508--528",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Methodology for Using Workforce Data to Decide Which Specialties and States to Target for Graduate Medical Education Expansion

AU - Fraher,Erin P.

AU - Knapton,Andy

AU - Holmes,George M.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Objective: To outline a methodology for allocating graduate medical education (GME) training positions based on data from a workforce projection model. Data Sources: Demand for visits is derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and Census data. Physician supply, retirements, and geographic mobility are estimated using concatenated AMA Masterfiles and ABMS certification data. The number and specialization behaviors of residents are derived from the AAMC's GMETrack survey. Design: We show how the methodology could be used to allocate 3,000 new GME slots over 5 years—15,000 total positions—by state and specialty to address workforce shortages in 2026. Extraction Methods: We use the model to identify shortages for 19 types of health care services provided by 35 specialties in 50 states. Principal Findings: The new GME slots are allocated to nearly all specialties, but nine states and the District of Columbia do not receive any new positions. Conclusions: This analysis illustrates an objective, evidence-based methodology for allocating GME positions that could be used as the starting point for discussions about GME expansion or redistribution.

AB - Objective: To outline a methodology for allocating graduate medical education (GME) training positions based on data from a workforce projection model. Data Sources: Demand for visits is derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and Census data. Physician supply, retirements, and geographic mobility are estimated using concatenated AMA Masterfiles and ABMS certification data. The number and specialization behaviors of residents are derived from the AAMC's GMETrack survey. Design: We show how the methodology could be used to allocate 3,000 new GME slots over 5 years—15,000 total positions—by state and specialty to address workforce shortages in 2026. Extraction Methods: We use the model to identify shortages for 19 types of health care services provided by 35 specialties in 50 states. Principal Findings: The new GME slots are allocated to nearly all specialties, but nine states and the District of Columbia do not receive any new positions. Conclusions: This analysis illustrates an objective, evidence-based methodology for allocating GME positions that could be used as the starting point for discussions about GME expansion or redistribution.

KW - Health policy/politics/law/regulation

KW - health workforce distribution/incomes/training

KW - medicare

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010843487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010843487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.12649

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.12649

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 508

EP - 528

JO - Health Services Research

T2 - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

ER -